Systems




Home



Conversations


There are only three choices: tax A plus tax B, tax A but no B, tax B but no A. The four choice (= no tax) is not presented for debate because it can't happen; in fantasy world it could, but not here.

There is a very simple reason why free thinking people should not talk about the presented choices: it would a waste of their time.

The only thing a free thinking individual should think is: I don't talk about tax choices because such a conversation is just toxic gas emitted by those who want to tax.

Therefore, even though there is no fourth choice to say "no taxes", there is a... fifth choice which reads "I am not wasting my time wandering through the toxic waste created by others. If I would do it, they would win the battle because instead of spending my time building, I would be wasting my life kibitzing about the subjects they choose, and thus I would be stopping myself from building Marvels."

So, take the fifth... element!



How can we form organizations that will counter governments?

The problem is that you want an organization to provide freedom.

If you make an organization than people who think differently than you will fight against your organization. Then you'll fight back to protect your organization.

The organization is going to trap you and those who fight against you. A system is a prison.

The only time when freedom will work as an intrinsic property of the human civilization is when humans will let it work. ... Just don't hold your breath :)

But there is a possibility. It's possible that if the human reach will become weak enough, some humans will escape the grip of the flock.

Some time in the future humans will use the graviton to obtain energy, propulsion, shields and weapons. They will be able to fly around and thus get far away just enough to escape the reach of those who want to control them. The "system" will break apart in the smallest possible pieces: the individuals.

No system is required to get there. It's just evolution.

There is no creature on this planet that could create one / many organization(s) which could defeat governments. However, it's possible to do things which would allow some people to escape the control of governments.

If you'll try to make an organization which would want to defeat governments, you'll waste your time and energy. If you would by chance succeed for a while, governments will be created back. Why? Because it is physically possible.

When it will be physically impossible for governments to form, that's the only moment when governments will die (but not defeated by anyone).



What does it mean for it to be "physically possible" or "physically impossible" for governments to form?

It's physically possible for some dudes who have all the good intentions to make up an organization whose declared goal is to protect people from criminals. Then these dudes tell to everybody how they can help them get rid of the evil from within the society. Then lots of people who have all the good intentions accept to follow certain rules and even pay some fee for protection.

Then more and more people join this organization and they start creating more and more rules, raise the fee and ultimately make it mandatory for non-members because more money is needed to manage all the rules.

It is a mistake to believe that the result of the actions of a government are disastrous because the government is evil. The result is disastrous because there are rules enforced on everybody, and because most people believe they are doing the right thing by creating such rules. Note: the evil is the (monopolistic) rule, not the intent.

This is physically possible (= can physically happen) just as going to the grocery store is physically possible.

Physically impossible is when the above can't physically happen, that is, can't make (most) people obey them.







Copyright by George Hara