Fluons

You can read about fluons here.

I was reading about fluons and I would like to know more.

Fluons are not about something new (particles or anything like that), but about a different way to look at mathematics. In mathematics, you can apply a function on a point and associate a different value to it; you know, each X has an Y associated. Point X actually becomes another point Y by applying a function on it.

I believe that real space manifests "features" like mathematical functions: points from it can become other points. To understand this, one has to simply translate the mathematical vision in real space, but by thinking that the X and Y axis overlap (instead of forming a 2-dimensional space like in any mathematical representation of a function). Of course, manifestation of fluons in Reality is pure speculation. The Fluon Theory is purely mathematical.

I believe there is no such thing as "particle", but only space that constantly vibrates. Particles that appear to us are actually some sort of lumps of space. But these lumps are actually ripples in space, ripples that can be described with wave functions. There is no particle per se, but only density waves of space (just like the ripples in water).

I can't picture a fluon!

You can't picture what a fluon is because you try to imagine some object. You separate matter / energy / forces from space. I say that everything is space. You are trying to imagine an object even though I say that the very continuity of space is remapped / translated.

I claim that one of the properties of real space is that it randomly remaps it's continuity. I claim this as an axiom. I claim this happens on a tinny scale billions of times per second. I claim this is an intrinsic property of space. It happens because it is the nature of real space. Space is not a void. Space is something with properties.

I didn't understand what fluons were. However, I did understand that they reshape space. Or, that they are the name given to the reshaping phenomenon.

Right. For example, a wave is not an phenomenon. A wave is a description of a phenomenon. It's a tricky thing to separate Reality from the description of Reality. We do not know what the phenomenon itself is. We describe it's evolution, but we do not know why and how it occurs from nothingness. This is the point where (and the point why) I claim that fluons describe a phenomenon I believe is real.

A wave is a mathematical function that describes the change of space during a certain natural phenomenon. If I say a wave if "f(x) = beta * phi(gamma)" you believe a wave is real. In fact, you should separate the description from the phenomenon. Does this function describe a real phenomenon (what we call "wave")? It could be, I just made it up. But Reality does not depend on my equations. The same way, I say "f(x) = x + 14" is a fluonic function (the previous being a wave function). Does this function describe a real phenomenon (what I call "fluon")? It could be.

Nobody knows what Reality... really is because we don't know how it came into existence and what actually makes it tick. Are we born from nothingness? How can something come up from nothing, from void? We do not know how and why things happen, but we can describe their evolution.

If you happen to understand what fluons are, regardless of what they do, being able to explain that could make fluonic technology much more appealing.

So how can I know what fluons are? I can only describe their evolution, what they do. The only thing I can say about what they are is: they are a property of space. I say that about the underlying reality of what we can observe: there is something we call space and this space is manifesting some intrinsic properties in Reality (or, our perception of it). Remapping its continuity is one of these properties.

Saying that fluons reshape the space is as vague as saying "To travel faster than light, you must active the super drive".

Right. Just as saying "there are 4 forces in the Universe" is a statement. Nobody knows how come they exist, why they exist, how they occurred. Of course, there is difference: we can observe these forces. We can also observe black-holes. One day we might observe fluons.

Maybe the tunneling effect is just that, which, simply put, says that electrons "jump" space. A fluon explains such "jumps". Of course, I can't explain how a fluon comes into existence, but I understand what it does.

Since you say fluons occur randomly, the tunneling effect would also have to happen randomly.

The tunneling effect happens in specific physical conditions and those conditions could be responsible for the non-random final effect.

Is fluonic drive faster than light travel?

No. The objects which move through a fluon, move just as they move without the fluon, that is, move in continuous space. For example, I explain the tunneling effect like this: an electron does not "jump" space, it moves in a continuous space, but the structure of the space itself is changed. So, objects could move at 1 meter per second through a fluon, yet they would still show up instantly at the destination (because for them there is no space between the source and the destination). The length of the space between source and destination is smaller than in normal space, it's simply zero.

There must be a way to manipulate fluonic transformations, or to produce them as desired. Describe, even if vaguely, that process.

It could be done by using a gravitational field of a certain intensity and structure. Most probably quantum gravity would be involved. But this is the part that is pure speculation. This part has no scientific support, either mathematical or physical. It only works for a game / movie to say this.